————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
1) Oct 16, 2006 — DoD announces resumption of mandatory anthrax vaccine shots
DR. William WINKENWERDER (Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs bio): ...There is no elevated threat situation, nor are there new specific circumstances that have given us reason to make this change and update in our policy.”...
DR. WINKENWERDER: ...I have not been vaccinated because I’m not in any of the targeted groups to be vaccinated. If I was, I would receive it — the vaccine without hesitation.
Just because the attacks were perpetrated here on U.S. soil does not mean that they were perpetrated by U.S. citizens. And I think the FBI has recently spoken to that issue, that they have under consideration the possibility of threat — of this — (inaudible) — been perpetrated by anyone, domestic or foreign. So —
Q Dr. Winkenwerder, if terrorists are a threat concern for this sort of attack, then why not have all DOD personnel, not just the ones in these specific areas? Why not vaccinate all DOD personnel?
DR. WINKENWERDER: Because in our judgment, the persons that we are now vaccinating are the persons who are at highest risk. (Technical difficulty.) I’m sorry. Have we just been interrupted again?
*
2) Oct 17, 2006 — Pres Bush uses Al Qaeda interest in weaponized anthrax during a speech:
“...The CIA program helped us uncover key operatives in al Qaeda’s biological weapons program, including a cell developing anthrax to be used in terrorist attacks.”
*
3) Mar 25, 2002 — former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Richard Myers grudgingly acknowledged that Al Qaeda had zero capability to produce anthrax.
transcript
EXCERPT — DoD press briefing, Mar 25, 2002:
Q: Over the weekend it was reported also that the U.S. military discovered what appeared to be the makings of an anthrax laboratory near Kandahar. Could you tell us, General, exactly what was found at this site? Was it just the equipment? Were there precursor chemicals? Was there any actual anthrax discovered so far in the exploitation of any of these sites in Afghanistan?
Myers: There was a lab in Kandahar where we did find some equipment that was indicative of perhaps manufacturing anthrax. Not all the equipment you would need was there, but there was some of the equipment. Looked like some of it had been tried to have been destroyed. There was no — at least right now, there were no large quantities of anthrax you could see. They’ll do the usual swabs and bring those back for analysis. And — so that’s what we found.
Q: Well, in any of these sites and I understand there were 60 that were exploited so far — has there been any evidence that any actual biological weapons were produced?
Myers: There have been — in the sites we have exploited so far, I think on five or six cases, some of the swabs that we took have turned out positive for anthrax and, I think, ricin. But the caveat to that is that there’s such minute amounts, that the anthrax could be naturally occurring, and the ricin could be there because of the castor bean. It could be that. And so, no, no conclusive proof of active agents.
Rumsfeld: But a great deal of evidence of a desire to have —
Myers: The intent is there to —
Q: Any idea where those five sites were that you just mentioned?
Myers: Oh, I think we know exactly where they were. (Laughter.) Are you asking, Mick? (Laughter.)
Q: I am.
Myers: We’ll have to check on that. I mean, if it’s releasable, we’ll certainly release it.
Q: Can I just follow up quickly? The equipment found, is that clearly to make anthrax or chemical/biological weapons, or was it possibly dual-use equipment?
Myers: Well, every — I mean —
Rumsfeld: Most equipment like that is dual use.
Myers: Dual use.
Rumsfeld: But there is no — we have so much evidence in writing of the desire to develop capabilities, chemical and biological capabilities, that the fact that it’s dual use is saying a pistol’s dual use; it can shoot at a target or it can shoot at a person.
Q: Well, was it clear from what you found that it was clearly for chemical —
Myers: Not only what we found there, but what led us to that particular site and how all that came together, it came together that that was a site they were using, from a good source, and so we went and we found what we found.
And somebody asked if there were agents. There were — there were no precursor chemicals either found, but there was equipment found.
Q: Can you talk about the type of equipment? Would it be things like fermenters or dryers or —
Myers: There was a dryer. There was an autoclave. There’s some other — and that’s the one I saw. There probably are others, and I just don’t know that, but not — like I said, not all the equipment you would need was present.
Yes?
Q: So it looked to you like an attempt to set it up, and they’d not gotten there yet, as far as —
Myers: I can’t — I’m just not that smart. I can’t tell you.