H05207
The U.S. Has Plans to Invade Iran Before Bush's Term Ends
Thoughtful, decent, moral citizens of these United States: I urge you to write to the editors of your local and national news outlets to insist that they authenticate or repudiate the information reported by The Telegraph. And I further urge you to write your congressman (or congresswoman) to inquire about their knowledge concerning this assertion. Finally, I urge you to write to President Bush, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and/or Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld to inquire about their plans to invade Iran before they leave office.
*Also See: Gulf Factor Key to PM’s Iran Vote Decision*
[Posted By ShiftShapers]Republished from Information Clearing House
Bill Gertz is a right-wing national security reporter for the Rev. Sun Yung Moon’s neo-fascist newspaper, The Washington Times. He’s also a spigot from which flows much classified information illegally leaked by like-minded “patriots” seeking to advance their hawkish agenda in the military-industrial-congressional complex. And, frankly speaking, that’s the only reason I pay any attention to him.
So I was hardly surprised when, on September 16, 2005, Gertz reported on the Bush administration’s “computer slide presentation.” which was aimed at persuading whoever would listen that Iran is working feverishly to build nuclear weapons.
According to Gertz, the report claims: “Iran’s nuclear program is well-scaled for a weapons capability, as a comparison to [Pakistan’s] nuclear weapons infrastructure shows…When one also considers Iran’s concealment and deception activities, it’s difficult to escape the conclusion that Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons.“
The report also states that “Iran’s uranium ore resources are insufficient for Tehran to produce enough fuel for civilian electrical power generating reactors. ‘However, Iran’s uranium resources are more than sufficient to support a nuclear weapons capability.’” [U.S. Report Says Iran Seeks To Acquire Nuclear Weapons,” Washington Times, 16 September 2005]
Unlike the Washington Post’s article on the subject two days earlier, Gertz predictably failed to…
Posted by ShiftShapers
Warning: Anyone who takes this blog seriously will be shot. Anyone who does not take it seriously will be buried alive by a Mitsubishi bulldozer. Welcome to (A)utonomous Resistance, GNN’s exclusive one-stop infoshop for radical resources and information....











The argument that the US could even consider invading Iran anytime soon is nuts. With what? Blackwater mercs? Or maybe as the Iraq exit strategy?
It would also be economic suicide. This article is interesting:
Attack on Iran would rocket oil prices to 400 dollars
Thu. 29 Sep 2005
Tehran, Iran, Sep. 29 – Oil prices on the international markets would shoot up to $400 a barrel if an attack were to be carried out on Iran, a senior Revolutionary Guards commander warned, Persian-language websites reported on Thursday.
Brigadier General Hassan Abbasi, who heads the Centre for Research on Security Without Borders Doctrines, speaking in the town of Karaj, said that until now negotiations with the Islamic Republic over its suspected nuclear weapons program were carried out in the framework of one of three doctrines; “Carrot and Stick”, “Good Cop, Bad Cop”, and “Trigger Mechanism”.
Abbasi described the West’s latest doctrine vis-à-vis Iran’s sensitive nuclear work as the “Chicken Strategy”, where “both parties follow a collision course at such fast speeds until one side eventually backs off”.
“This is the first time when the strategic balance between both sides is equal and Iran’s strategic stance is no longer from a position of weakness”, Abbasi said.
The Revolutionary Guards General criticised Tehran’s previous policy of allowing international monitors to inspect a number of Iran’s nuclear facilities as well as suspending uranium enrichment activities. Abbasi warned that such a weak policy had run the risk of “the enemy defeating a country of 70 million people”.
“Given the West’s new doctrine against Iran, our country’s officials must resist to the last moment”, Abbasi insisted, adding that they must make use of the country’s geo-strategic position and economic advantages, such as its immense oil reserves, so as to never back down from their stance.
“All of this is at a time when the West’s problem is simply a shaky economy dependent on oil”.
“During last year’s evaluations of various theoretical outcomes, we reached the conclusion that in the event of an oil sales embargo on Iran the price of oil would reach 110 dollars and in the case of a military attack on Iran its price would reach 400 dollars. Therefore, knowing the West’s strategic knowledge of this matter, the oil sanction and military attack options against Iran are just a bluff.”
The senior Revolutionary Guards commander summed up by stating that Iran’s international nuclear stand-off had not reached an unmanageable crisis point and that Tehran had to continue its offensive.
With what? Blackwater mercs?
Feel a Draft?
Good plan, they invade Iran at the last possible minute and leave all the work to the next president, who I doubt it would be yet another republican
Feel a Draft?
Yeah, but even so, to get enough troops prepped to invade Iran would take too long and be too costly to be feasible. Especially with the situation in Iraq, and with Iran already threatening to use oil as a weapon- against the US’s already fucked economy (and “the west” in general). Though I have no doubt that there are plans already drawn up on how to do it the “right way” in light of the clusterfuck that the Iraq “cakewalk” has become. It just doesn’t fit in my book of likely scenarios.
Besides, isn’t south america next?
If Iran was such a threat, you’d think there would be some countries other than Israel and the US saying Iran is a threat, and/or doing something about it. Countries that are a little closer and would be more at risk like say Russia.
Iran is not a threat. this is not about threats. this is about being a threat, and acting upon that power. this is about geo-strategic and economic global supremacy, and full spectrum dominance. this is about a new world order.
Besides, isn’t south america next?
Venezuela is already buying all kinds of weapons, so soon they’ll be even thougher than Iran.
Plus theres Brasil that has a pretty big army and the capacity to create an atomic bomb in no time. Mix that with the little distance to the US and you’ve the perfect recipe for complete destruction
Iran’s only threat is to the US economy throught their oil bourse. Euro oil trading led the hawks to Iraq, it will take them to Iran. One of the first things they will do is revert the trades back to USD.
I really don’t think 400USD oil will put the neocons off. It might actually encourage them because it will increase demand for dollars and thus inject stability into the petrodollar, which will enable them to increase their budget deficits even more. They don’t care about Americans and how much they pay for oil, all they care about is stealing taxpayers money to give it to their corporate backers.
Appreciate the war pimp thread Shift, and all the other hubs you’ve got going.
Is it possible that this is mere sabre-rattling – possibly they’ll keep Iran as a bogeyman for later? Like they did with Saddam in the early ’90’s?
If true, great news! I know that Iran is more developed politically than Iraq, and Iranian’s have a for less violent and far more sophisticated political culture. This war would be a quick overthrow followed by a quite move to democracy.
Fantastic if true. However I suspect that since I didn’t read about this matter in a mainstream source, it is unlikely true.
I suspect that since I didn’t read about this matter in a mainstream source, it is unlikely true.
yeah, mainstream media always tells the truth. LOL
which brings me to another question: if you think only mainstream media reports the truth, what the hell are you doing here?!?
I know that Iran is more developed politically than Iraq, and Iranian’s have a for less violent and far more sophisticated political culture. This war would be a quick overthrow followed by a quite move to democracy.
Iran already has a democracy.
British drum beating
Butt – Is it possible that this is mere sabre-rattling – possibly they’ll keep Iran as a bogeyman for later?
That’s kind of what I was thinking. There’s no way the US gov would put themselves in a position of an oil embargo or disruption in Iran at least until Iraq’s facilities are fully operating. Unless, of course, the plan is to have a major oil shock and crash the economy. I guess that’s possible, but seems unlikely.