Shooting War Getting A Grip Wolves In Sheep's Clothing

H17988

Headlines : "War on Terror"
Summary:

It’s tempting, of course, to think of what might be about to go terribly wrong. But, nevertheless, it does seem like an incredible achievement. Everyone’s asking to remain anonymous, and the Iraqis are the only ones insisting that the dates have been set.

The key make-it-or-break-it issue appears to be the immunity one.

“The Iraqis also want American forces hand over any Iraqi they detain. The U.S. insists that detainees must be ‘ready’ for handover, which the Iraqi officials assume means the Americans want to interrogate them first.”

Perhaps interrogate should also be “in quotes”.

[Posted By microdot]
By QASSIM ABDUL-ZAHRA and and ANNE GEARAN
Republished from Associated Press
Iraq and the U.S. are near an agreement on all American combat troops leaving Iraq by October 2010

BAGHDAD – Iraq and the U.S. are near an agreement on all American combat troops leaving Iraq by October 2010, with the last soldiers out three years after that, two Iraqi officials told The Associated Press on Thursday. U.S. officials, however, insisted no dates had been agreed.

The proposed agreement calls for Americans to hand over parts of Baghdad’s Green Zone — where the U.S. Embassy is located — to the Iraqis by the end of 2008. It would also remove U.S. forces from Iraqi cities by June 30, 2009, according to the two senior officials, both close to Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki and familiar with the negotiations.

The officials, who spoke separately on condition of anonymity because the talks are ongoing, said all U.S. combat troops would leave Iraq by October 2010, with the remaining support personnel gone “around 2013.” The schedule could be amended if both sides agree — a face-saving escape clause that would extend the presence of U.S. forces if security conditions warrant it.

[end excerpt]
Click here to read the rest of the article
microdot

Posted by microdot
What?

RECENT COMMENTS

Hand over the Green Zone — by the end of this year. Can you imagine?

I can’t imagine.

What’s that gonna do to Matt’s new movie?

microdot @ 08/08/08 08:51:11

Here’s the question to be asking ourselves. Why, with the Trillion Plus in FY08’s Warmongering Budget, would the United States be suddenly amenable to closing out there occupation of Iraq?

Currently their number one laudromat.

Why why why, how how how?

microdot @ 08/08/08 09:35:16

Could they have found a more temperamental target than Iran?

microdot @ 08/08/08 09:36:45

A clue?

US weighs stepped-up military forays into Pakistan

Officials closer to the front lines in Afghanistan also are pushing for a newly aggressive stance. The rules currently limiting U.S. incursions into Pakistan when in hot pursuit of enemy fighters or targets would not be stretched under the plan. But U.S. forces would be encouraged to use that authority liberally.

Afghanistan’s ambassador to the U.S. supports the plan…“The argument that we may destabilize Pakistan has taken us to where we are right now,” Ambassador Said T. Jawad told the AP. “Pursuing the policy of public praise and private pressure on Pakistan doesn’t work.”

Szamko @ 08/08/08 09:45:47

“As of 2005-2006, according to the company, about half of Blackwater’s business was made up of its security work in places like Iraq, Afghanistan and post-Katrina New Orleans. Today, Jackson says it is about 30 percent."

END OF QUOTE

Have we heard anything about Blackwater vacating Iraq?

I don’t think so.

It’s ALL growth baby.

microdot @ 08/08/08 09:54:25
Login

Sign up for the GNN newsletter to get the first word on video premieres and breaking news. signup

Read the GNN FAQ for information about the site, forum rules and other GNN 2.0 information. faq

Optimized for FireFox
To download the Firefox web browser, visit mozilla.com Get Firefox

  • Advertise With GNN
  • SUPPORT GNN! Support GNN

    TEES/DVDS @ GNN STORE

    Buy Our Tees
  • Bloggers' Rights at EFF