Shooting War Gen-We Getting A Grip Wolves In Sheep's Clothing

A02298

Hopium
Articles : Human Rights
_NEWS IMAGE_
 Photo: Indymedia Mexico 
San Salvador Atenco attacks follow blueprint of terror from the 70s and 80s

MEXICO CITY: Between 1970 and 1982, three Mexican presidents waged a “dirty war” against dissidents from one end of the country to the next. Recently compiled documentation lists 15,000 illegal detentions during that terrible period, thousands of instances of torture, and the forced disappearance of more than 700 Mexican citizens (see “Disappearing the Disappeared” upcoming next week).

Nowhere was the dirty war more cruelly fought then along the Pacific coast of Guerrero state where farmers had risen in rebellion behind the rural school teacher-turned guerrillero Lucio Cabanas and his Party of the Poor. Carlos Montemayor, author of “War In Paradise,” perhaps the most vehement expose of that repression, is an assiduous scholar of how the dirty war in Guerrero was organized and carried out.

Writing in the left daily La Jornada, Montemayor recently described the characteristics of that counter-insurgency campaign against farming villages along the Guerrero coast, and the striking similarities to the May 4th assault on San Salvador Atenco just outside of Mexico City by thousands of highly militarized police to quell a campesino rebellion.

According to Montemayor’s description, first an overwhelming force is assembled with the primary mission of totally subjugating a recalcitrant population. Then informers are introduced into the village to identify and eliminate rebel community leaders and those associated with them. If the leaders evade capture, their families are held hostage. Young men are rounded up and selectively tortured to extract information and to turn them into “soplones” (informers.)

Meanwhile, shock troops terrorize the civilian population into submission. Indiscriminate beatings, home invasions, the theft of personal items of value, and the systematic destruction of property are encouraged by police commanders. Women are raped and sexually abused to underscore the occupation force’s total domination over the rebellious villagers.

Virtually all of these dirty war characteristics were on display in San Salvador Atenco May 4th when 3000 armed state police and elements of the Federal Preventative Police (PFP), a force largely extracted from the Mexican military, slammed into that dirt-poor town of 30,000 out on the dried lake beds east of the capital, killing one 14-year-old, leaving a 20-year-old student hovering between life and death, and arresting 209, all of whom required hospitalization from the beatings they received under security force batons – although only some prisoners actually received it (and they were chained to their hospital beds.) Of 47 women arrested, 23 reported that they had been raped or were otherwise sexually abused. One 53 year-old mother who had gone to a local store to buy a birthday present for her son was forced to perform oral sex on three police “officers” to avoid arrest.

Those arrested included farmers and farm women, human rights observers, lawyers, alternative reporters, non-Mexicans, and adherents of the Zapatista Army of National Liberation’s Other Campaign who had traveled to San Salvador Atenco in solidarity at the urging of former EZLN Subcomandante Marcos, now doing business as Delegate Zero. All were originally held on charges of participating in an organized criminal conspiracy, a crime that mandates a 20-year sentence.

One object of such collective repression, noted Montemayor, is the identification and elimination of local leadership. In Atenco, the most identifiable voice of the farmers’ rebellion is Ignacio del Valle, a leader of the Popular Front for the Defense of the Land whose militants picked up their broad machetes three years ago and successively defended the town’s corn lands from expropriation by President Vicente Fox for a new, multi-billion dollar Mexico City International Airport, thereby incurring the undying scorn of the president and his cronies who stood to make a killing on the deal.

Nacho del Valle and his second-in-command Felipe Alvarez were captured on the first day of the fighting and immediately clapped into Mexico’s maximum lock-up at nearby La Palma on “kidnapping” charges that evolved from an acrimonious February meeting with Mexico state officials – the charges carry 30 to 50 year prison sentences. 26 other members of the Popular Front have since been incarcerated on the same charge.

As per Carlos Montemayor’s script, Del Valle’s immediate family was singled out for special repression. Their home was destroyed by invading police and one son was disappeared for several days until he turned up badly beaten in a Mexico state prison. Nacho’s daughter, América, increasingly the spokesperson for the Popular Front to Defend the Land, has been forced into hiding.

In classic dirty war mode, police brought in ski-masked informers who went from house to house pointing out Popular Front sympathizers. Police broke down doors and invaded private homes without warrants, firing weapons, beating the residents bloody, and smashing the furniture into kindling.

At least 23 complaints of sexual assault including seven rapes – one boy was sodomized with a police baton – have been registered with the National Human Rights Commission (CNDH) and the non-government Miguel Pro Human Rights Center. Most were victimized on an horrific six hour ride between Atenco and a local Mexico state prison during which police “officers” pawed women, ripped off their underclothes, masturbated openly, and in serial rapist fashion, forced their victims not to look at them to prevent identification.

Lorena, a diminutive 22 year-old “adherent” to the Other Campaign, tells of being beaten and manhandled by arresting officers and then thrown into a truckful of women prisoners who had been beaten so badly that their blood covered the floor of the vehicle. Ordered to lie face down on top of the injured women, one police “officer” ripped off her pants and upon discovering that she was menstruating, began beating her, screaming that he would make her “really bleed.” Later, he or one of his fellow “officers” tried to anally penetrate Lorena but was warned off because the truck was nearing the prison. In anger, the “officer” smashed Lorena’s head into the truck wall.

Women are considered “botines” (prizes) in the dirty war, Montemayor explains, and the violations of the women from Atenco were not so much sexual as they were an expression of male government domination – all part of the dirty war plan.

Four of the arrested and abused women were non-Mexicans and immigration authorities swooped in before they could reveal what had happened during the nightmare ride from Atenco May 4th. Despite ten years of residence in Mexico, Valentina Palma, a Chilean filmmaker who was shooting a documentary in Atenco, and her companion Mario Guerrero were summarily deported under Article 33 of the Mexican constitution which allows the president to kick out any foreigner deemed “inconvenient.”

Other deportees included Samantha Deitmar, a German documentarian, and two Catalanes Maria Sostres and Cristina Valls, all of whom were physically abused. The women pledge to take legal action against the Fox administration and appeal their summary deportations.

400 foreign human rights observers were deported from Chiapas by former president Ernesto Zedillo, most after the 1997 Acteal massacre of Zapatista supporters, to prevent dissemination of first hand accounts of abuses in that southernmost Mexican state. While Fox has been more selective in booting out “inconvenient” foreigners, in 2003 he ordered the deportation of 17 Evergreen University (Washington state) students and their professor for marching alongside the “Macheteros” of Atenco, then battling Fox’s airport, in the annual May 1st International Workers Day mobilization.

In the Montemayor model, collective assaults such as at Atenco are not improvised attacks by out-of-control security forces but meticulously plotted at the highest echelons of power. Such operations invariably involve more than one agency so a high degree of coordination is required. The chain of command often goes straight to the top. Overall responsibility for the assault on San Salvador Atenco fell to Fox’s Secretary of Public Security Eduardo Medina Mora, former chief of the CISEN, Mexico’s lead national security investigative police agency.

In charge on the ground was Mexico state public security director Wilfrido Robledo, the disgraced ex-head of the Federal Preventative Police under Zedillo and cousin of narco kingpin Mario Villanueva Madrid, former governor of Quintana Roo who is currently doing long time in the same maximum-security prison that now houses Nacho del Valle and the leadership of the Popular Front.

Five regional PFP commanders were brought in to coordinate logistics. As has been the modus operendi in other recent government assaults on farmers and workers groups in resistance, elite state police sharpshooters led the May 4th retaking of San Salvador Atenco backed up by baton-wielding federal robo-cops.

Carlos Montemayor’s blueprint for such dirty war thrusts includes the minimizing of press presence to limit the political outfall from such operations – either by silencing the press or “embedding” reporters in security force ranks. At Atenco, reporters were allowed through police lines on the first day of combat to film acts of vandalism by the infuriated farmers but the next day were grouped behind the invading police to record the re-taking of the town. Nonetheless, despite manipulation by both authorities and their own editors, television crews caught some of the most stomach-wrenching footage of police brutality ever shown on Mexican TV screens.

Finally, Carlos Montemayor points out that because such collective repression is bound to be politically damaging, the political class must sign off on acts of state violence either prior to the attack or once the repression has been accomplished. The assault on Atenco was no exception. Vicente Fox, his right wing PAN party, and its presidential candidate Felipe Calderon, along with once-ruling (71 years) Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) standard-bearer Roberto Madrazo all endorsed the “hard hand” (“mano dura”) shown at Atenco. The repression was also tacitly approved by left-center challenger Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador of the Party of the Democratic Revolution (PRD) who declined to condemn the police brutality. Another big booster: Mexico state governor Enrique Peña Nieto who a week after the bloody confrontation sent thousands of gallons of paint to San Salvador Atenco to white wash the damaged town.

In contrast to the candidates and their political parties, the Zapatistas’ Other Campaign, an anti-electoral crusade designed to weld together Mexico’s underclass in an anti-neo-liberal alliance, has raised the atrocities committed at Atenco as a flag of resistance. With the EZLN’s quixotic spokesperson Subcomandante Marcos leading marches and inspiring solidarity protests against the Fox government, demonstrations took place last week (May 10th-17th) in 17 countries and 34 cities in support of the farmers of Atenco.

One of those cities was Vienna, Austria where President Fox was greeted by demonstrators shouting their outrage at human rights abuses in Atenco as he arrived for a Latin America-European Union summit.

Ironically, the San Salvador Atenco atrocities took place the same week Mexico assumed a position on the newly revised United Nations Human Rights Commission in Geneva, alongside such formidable human rights abusers as China, Russia, Cuba, and Saudi Arabia. Mexico joins the commission “with its hands bloodied” by the repression in Atenco, bemoaned National Human Rights Commission ombudsman Jose Luis Soberanes, an outspoken critic of the Fox regime’s human rights record.

“We are again convoked by our pain” Subcomandante Marcos told thousands in a driving rainstorm a mile from the presidential palace on Friday, May 12th after a long week of solidarity actions. “Who can listen to the stories of the women of Atenco, to the men, to the old people who were beaten, and the youth, and remain indifferent? No, not us, not those who are part of the Other Campaign.” Marcos reaffirmed that the Other Campaign will remain in Mexico City indefinitely until all the farmers of Atenco are released from prison.

John Ross is in California, watching basketball. Making Another World Possible: Zapatista Chronicles 2000-2006 is in New York being inspected by editors. Ross will return to Mexico in early June to report on the final spasms of the presidential election race and the twitchings of the Other Campaign.

This article is republished with permission from our friends at the Narco News Bulletin. Narco News is funded by your contributions to The Fund for Authentic Journalism.

anthony

Posted by anthony
Anthony Lappé is GNN's Executive Editor. He's written for The New York Times, Details, New York, Paper, The Fader and Vice, among many others. He has worked as a producer for MTV and Fuse. He is the co-author of GNN's True Lies and the producer of their Iraq doc,...

Disclaimer: Statements and opinions expressed in articles published on this site are those of the authors and not of the staff or editors of GNN, unless otherwise stated.

RECENT COMMENTS

The disgusting thing is this was barely covered by the American media
where is the outrage and where is the fight

it is total bullshit
something seriously revolutionary needs to happen

Maclite @ 05/24/06 10:36:03

Anthony, thanks for posting this article. John Ross is a great writer. His reporting on Boise Cascade Corporations’s activities in Guerrero were landmark.

I composed an original blog about Guerrero and the Guerra Sucia in early March, maybe folks interested in these issues will enjoy the read.

And on a cultural note, actor Gael Garcia Bernal denounced police brutality in México at the Cannes premier of the new film BABEL.

manyhues @ 05/24/06 10:54:01

I keep thinking things in Mexico are a lot worse than I thought and then they turn out to be even worse than even that.

ubiquity @ 05/24/06 17:06:09

Muchas gracias Anthony.

locomayor @ 05/25/06 00:56:06

This is my (ed.) editing and my google-aided translation of an op ed piece from today’s center left Mexican daily newspaper mentioned in the original article — La Jornada

From LA JORNADA May 24

Arnoldo Kraus

**The Raped of Atenco* *Text read [originally in Spanish]the 22 of May in the Los Angeles Hall during the multidisciplinary festival Women without Fear. We are all Atenco.

...From Juárez City to San Salvador Atenco is always the same distance…. These cities portray contemporary Mexico….

There is an expression “the dead of Juárez” and now add “the raped of Atenco.” The fundamental difference is that the dead cannot speak or denounce, whereas the raped women count on the weight of their words and the voice of their hurt bodies. Women of Juárez and of Atenco are similar for being victims of power and because their histories clearly draw the faces of the Presidency of Vicente Fox and of the governors of Chihuahua, where the dead keep piling up, and of Enrique Pena Nieto, present governor of the state of Mexico. Faithful testimonies of those events are the programs of the European television transmitters and the narrations of Mexican and foreign authors, all of which have revealed the crude and undeniable reality of the dead of Juárez. The photographies that show hematomas, as much in atenquenses as in some foreigners, struck by the police in Atenco, are also part of today’s Mexican landscape and the modus operandi of our politicians.

Cinema, newspapers, television and photographs are travelling untiring and growing awareness. Their messages prevent, at least a little, that silence and the lie that bury the truth. Whereas our President assured in Vienna, where he said that “the use of the force brought peace to Atenco before the ‘attack of the violence”; outside, the placards said, in German and Spanish: “Fox Lies that Mexico Respect Human Rights.” For us to boast of the recent entrance of Mexico as part of the Council of Human rights of the United Nations is to make accomplices of us of the ignorance and unreason that governs to the world.

The events of Atenco confront two brutal realities: The physical violations of the woman and the power of the politicians to control the consequences.

The incredulity of our governors, the indefatigable defense of the police acts to maintain the order and the almost absolute negation of the complaints of violations by the Mexicans and the tortured foreigners reproduce the injustice of the Mexican political class well. I mention part of its image management: “there were no tortures or violations, but sexual abuses” (Miguel Angel Yunes undersecretary of Prevención and Citizen Participation of federal Security Public), “until the moment there are accusations of extreme no violence” (Eduardo Medina Mora, secretary of Public Security), or, the Maxim of the secretary of Interior, Carlos Abascal Carranza, who asserted that “any excess will be punished”, lines that must be seen under the optics of their tremendous lies , then, continue denying even that the foreigners were struck.

The image management of our ruling class does not admit doubt. Their language and dishonesty are the worse forms of violence: the one that denies the truth, the one that buries the ethics, the one that generates intolerancia. Its words against the blows; its religion against the objectivity of the photographies; its disdain against the infinite pain of the raped women; its contempt by the national and international public opinion against the free voices that cry out justice.

It is obvious that the past of the victims comprises of the present. That reality is dogma in our country. The violated ones of Atenco are a clear example of the malignant power of the State, mainly if it thinks that the physical fragility of the women makes easy prey by brutality. Compatible dogma is the force of the political machinery designed to ignore and to bury everything with which it does not agree. And here it is necessary to stop and to ask: who is more violating: the State or the police? The masculine hormones or the weight and the deafness of the power?

In our country, the lie and the disdain have received the letter of authority and imperishable certificate against everything what smells of disent. The incapacity to argue against the government is pathetic. The negation of the reality is a sample of that deafness, of that aged stuttering of reason and learning so that the impunity of the powerful continues to grow. The corollary is gratuitous: to be a politician in this “new government of change” is to deny any evidence that exposes the truth. I ask again: who is more violating: the State or the police? It is evident that the guilty police are only some fragments of the body of the responsible politicians.

Before the implacable geography and the congenital deafness of our governors it is necessary to speak and imperative to continue looking for the routes to resist against the extreme deafness. Neither the dead of Juárez nor the violated ones of Atenco were or are different from most of the connacionales. They were and they are of our house, they were and they are common citizens.

We must denounce the barbarism and more. The barbarism is not the only thing that causes the pain, but it is the indifference or forgetfulness of the last injustices. Acteal, Juárez City, Guerrero, Atenco are alive and are examples of that torrid injustice. Neither the ultrajados geography nor bodies nor the unfortunate dead nor the photographs lie: in order to arrive at San Salvador Atenco from Juárez City it is necessary to pass through the Pines [ed. the Mexican White House.

Lot08 @ 05/25/06 03:47:44
Login

Sign up for the GNN newsletter to get the first word on video premieres and breaking news. signup

Read the GNN FAQ for information about the site, forum rules and other GNN 2.0 information. faq

Optimized for FireFox
To download the Firefox web browser, visit mozilla.com Get Firefox

  • Advertise With GNN
  • SUPPORT GNN! Support GNN

    TEES/DVDS @ GNN STORE

    Buy Our Tees
  • Bloggers' Rights at EFF