Shooting War Gen-We Getting A Grip Wolves In Sheep's Clothing

A02078

Hopium
Articles : "War on Terror"
_NEWS IMAGE_
 The prince of darkness? 
Saudi prince who met with bin Laden five times is a guest at the SOTU

While Cindy Sheehan was being dragged from the House gallery moments before President Bush delivered his State of the Union address for wearing a t-shirt honoring her son and the other 2,244 U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq, Turki al-Faisal was settling into his seat inside the gallery. Faisal, a Saudi, is a man who has met Osama bin Laden and his lieutenants on at least five occasions, describing the al Qaeda leader as “quite a pleasant man.” He met multiple times with Taliban leader Mullah Mohammed Omar.

Yet, unlike Sheehan, al-Faisal was a welcomed guest of President Bush on Tuesday night. He is also a man that the families of more than 600 victims of the 9/11 attacks believe was connected to their loved ones’ deaths.

Al-Faisal is actually Prince Turki al-Faisal, a leading member of the Saudi royal family and the kingdom’s current ambassador to the U.S. But the bulk of his career was spent at the helm of the feared Saudi intelligence services from 1977 to 2001. Last year, The New York Times pointed out that “he personally managed Riyadh’s relations with Osama bin Laden and Mullah Muhammad Omar of the Taliban. Anyone else who had dealings with even a fraction of the notorious characters the prince has worked with over the years would never make it past a U.S. immigration counter, let alone to the most exclusive offices in Washington.” Al-Faisal was also named in the $1 trillion lawsuit filed by hundreds of 9/11 victims’ families, who accused him of funding bin Laden’s network. Curiously, his tenure as head of Saudi intelligence came to an abrupt and unexpected end 10 days before the 9/11 attacks.

“Nobody explained the circumstances under which he left,” says As’ad AbuKhalil, author of The Battle for Saudi Arabia: Royalty, Fundamentalism, and Global Power. “We know for sure that he was tasked by the United States government back in the late 1970s and on to assemble the kind of Arab Muslim fanatical volunteers to help the United States and the C.I.A. in the fight against the Soviet communist regime [in Afghanistan]. In the course of doing that, this man is single-handedly most responsible for the kind of menace that these fanatical groups now pose to world peace and security.” Yet, there al-Faisal sat on Tuesday as President Bush spoke of his war on terror and Cindy Sheehan was being booked. At one point, the cameras even panned directly on al-Faisal listening intently to Bush.

The 9/11 families’ lawsuit charged that al-Faisal secretly traveled to the southern Afghan city of Kandahar twice in 1998 where he met with bin Laden’s representatives and Taliban leader Mullah Mohammed Omar. Based on sworn testimony from Taliban intelligence chief, Mullah Kakshar, the lawsuit claimed that al-Faisal allegedly received assurances that al Qaeda would not use “the infrastructure in Afghanistan to subvert the royal families’ control of Saudi government.” In return, according to the lawsuit, the Saudis promised not to seek bin Laden’s extradition or the closing of his training bases. Al-Faisal also allegedly promised Mullah Omar financial assistance. Shortly after the meetings, the Saudis reportedly shipped the Taliban 400 new pickup trucks. According to the London Observer, Kakshar also said that al-Faisal “arranged for donations to be made directly to al-Qaeda and bin Laden by a group of wealthy Saudi businessmen. ‘Mullah Kakshar’s sworn statement implicates Prince Turki as the facilitator of these money transfers in support of the Taliban, al-Qaeda and international terrorism,’” according to the lawsuit.

Al-Faisal does not deny he traveled to Afghanistan in 1998 for meetings with Mullah Omar, but he insists it was to “convey an official Saudi request to extradite Osama bin Laden.” al-Faisal has a long history in Afghanistan. He worked closely in the 1980s with the both the CIA and the mujahadeen that would later form both al Qaeda and the Taliban.

Ultimately, a judge dismissed the 9/11 families’ lawsuit against al-Faisal and his cohorts, saying US courts lacked jurisdiction over the matter. But many of those families believe firmly that al-Faisal was connected to the attacks that killed their loved ones. The obvious question is: how does the president justify the ejection of a Gold Star Mother from the State of the Union, while openly welcoming a man believed by hundreds of victims’ families to be connected to the attack Bush uses to justify every shred of his violent policies?

During his speech, Bush said, “It is said that prior to the attacks of September the 11th, our government failed to connect the dots of the conspiracy.” Perhaps he should have just looked over his wife’s shoulder up there in the gallery during the State of the Union.

GNN contributor Jeremy Scahill, an independent journalist who reports frequently for the national radio and TV program Democracy Now, has spent extensive time reporting from Iraq and Yugoslavia. He is currently a Puffin Writing Fellow at The Nation Institute. He can be reached at jeremy@democracynow.org.

anthony

Posted by anthony
Anthony Lappé is GNN's Executive Editor. He's written for The New York Times, Details, New York, Paper, The Fader and Vice, among many others. He has worked as a producer for MTV and Fuse. He is the co-author of GNN's True Lies and the producer of their Iraq doc,...

Disclaimer: Statements and opinions expressed in articles published on this site are those of the authors and not of the staff or editors of GNN, unless otherwise stated.

RECENT COMMENTS

Well, considering Bin Laden is most likely innocent and was framed for the attack, this article becomes irrelevant.

daij @ 02/03/06 04:29:57

Jeremy Scahill, Democracy Now, and The Nation Completely Blow the REAL Story – JEROME HAUER NOW ON BIOPORT BOARD OF DIRECTORS

***

At least this time Jeremy didn’t completely blow the real story. But yes, he misses the greater implications of what al-Faisal’s buddy-buddy relationship with Bush really tells us.

mkane @ 02/03/06 07:42:29

The meme spreads. Good job.

daij – Surely, this was no ‘Caveman’ conspriacy theory, but as to Bid laden being innocent and framed, this oversimplification lets a lot of people in FedGov and US intelligence off of the hook real easy. There is a rich tapestry of data out there that weaves itself together into a complex fabric of truth. Simple binary analysis will not produce sastisfactory results.

cheers – v

valis @ 02/03/06 10:36:59

Very well said Valis

mkane @ 02/03/06 14:06:58

I agree that the situation we are presented with is indeed a “complex fabric of truth”...and it seems that we are going to have to weave much of that fabric ourselves, constantly learning new methods, building new datasets, and embracing new ideas if we are to ever weave an inpenetrable cloth which future generations may sleep under or break their fall with.

zirkonyx @ 02/03/06 17:33:52

Indeed. well said as well, Z.

valis @ 02/03/06 22:27:33

valis: Agreed, there’s a complex fabric of truth (and lies) out there. A simple statement does not necessary come from an oversimplified analysis. My own review over the last few years gives me the impression that Osama Bin Laden probably had very little to do with the attacks except taking the blame, thus my previous post.

I would love it if you could briefly explain why you consider this an oversimplification and how it let’s others off the hook.

Are you refferring to the (in my view mostly unrelated to 9/11) US support for Bin Laden and islamic militias in Afghanistan, Bosnia etc?

daij @ 02/04/06 03:27:22

Show me a source that proves the US “directly” funded bin Laden when he was in Afghanistan

anthony @ 02/04/06 18:34:58

Article 1 of 11,000 entries on “Tim Osman”:
http://www.orlingrabbe.com/binladin_timosman.htm

WTF difference does it make if U.S. funding was “direct”
or through cut-outs?

lday @ 02/04/06 19:44:00

Show me a source that proves the US “directly” funded bin Laden when he was in Afghanistan —a

yeah, i mean, wasn’t the whole deal with bin laden joining up the afghan fight based on the fact that he had bags and bags of money?

whateveryousay @ 02/05/06 05:17:11
Login

Sign up for the GNN newsletter to get the first word on video premieres and breaking news. signup

Read the GNN FAQ for information about the site, forum rules and other GNN 2.0 information. faq

Optimized for FireFox
To download the Firefox web browser, visit mozilla.com Get Firefox

  • Advertise With GNN
  • SUPPORT GNN! Support GNN

    TEES/DVDS @ GNN STORE

    Buy Our Tees
  • Bloggers' Rights at EFF