A02049
Pulp Factions
Christmas Eve 2002, Alfredo Bazzini went to draw water from the family well in Las Flores, a small farming town in western Uruguay. What he found was that the water his family depended on for drinking, cooking, washing, and farming had dried up.
“It wasn’t only my well that didn’t have any water, all of the wells in town, even the deepest, were empty, and nobody knew what to do,” Bazzini recalls.
For the residents of Las Flores in the department (province) of Paysandú, this was the climax to a desperate story that began some two years earlier, when the water level in local wells dropped by up to 60 percent. And kept dropping.
“When it rained the wells filled up almost to the top, but then the water level would drop to even lower than it had been before,” said Bazzini.
With no way to bring water in from outside, townspeople watched helplessly as their watermelons and peanuts — the mainstay crops of the local economy — began to dry up, too.
Eucalyptus as Far as the Eye Can See
The culprit, it turns out, is the Eucalyptus tree, or rather the large-scale plantations run by international corporations that are spreading across Uruguay. The tree farms are heavily fertilized by tax subsidies from the federal government and aid from such international financial institutions as the World Bank and Inter-American Development Bank. Las Flores lies just three kilometers east of Piedras Coloradas, the main town in a region that has been afflicted by a growing water shortage since becoming a favored location for this lucrative new crop.
Other settlements in the region are also suffering the impact of eucalyptus plantations. The forestry companies are buying up more and more land and the eucalyptus forests are now spreading up to the very doors of the small towns and villages,” commented fruit grower David Kertesz. That is what happened at Las Flores. “At first the plantations were far away, but little by little they kept moving closer,” Bazzini reported. “When they reached to just a few meters out of town, the water ran out and the land died.”
“That Christmas Eve we hit rock bottom,” Bazzini recounted. “The little water left was gone, and it never came back.” The 40 local families who lived off the land were forced to leave everything behind and move away. Only five houses remained occupied. Today, Las Flores is known as Pueblo Seco, “Dry Town.”
The phenomenon is being repeated throughout the plantation region. Downstream from the San Francisco creek near Piedras Coloradas, local residents no longer have enough water to raise cattle. Nearby, in the village of Colonia 19 de Abril, 25 to 30 meter wells have dried up, and so has most of the surrounding marshland, said Augusto Sande, a farm produce transporter. Now, “to find water you have to dig a well at least 60 meters deep, which costs $4,000, and almost none of the farmers have that kind of money,” remarked Sande.
Native to Australia, the eucalyptus is ideal for pulpwood production: It grows quickly and is accomplished at scavenging large amounts of water at the expense of other plants. Foreign-owned large-scale plantations of the fragrant trees now occupy more than 700,000 hectares (2,700 square miles) in Uruguay, estimates María Selva Ortiz of the REDES- member of the Friends of the Earth non-governmental environmental network.
Botnia of Finland has planted trees on 60,000 hectares (232 square miles) of prime land, while ENCE of Spain already owns 50,000 hectares (183 square miles) and plans to purchase even more, according to Ricardo Carrere, spokesperson for local environmental group Guayabira.
But some in the halls of government, the ivory tower, and on the ground question the development. Uruguayan Agriculture Minister José Mujica has publicly called for limiting monoculture tree plantations, to prevent further degradation of the soil and exhaustion of the country’s water supply. Máximo D’Atri, an independent researcher notes that “In all of the locations where there is eucalyptus monoculture forestry, the water supply is running out, and in the areas near these forests, the arable land has suffered irreversible deterioration.” And two farm workers who have watched the deterioration first-hand agree. “The more eucalyptus trees they plant, the less water we have. Things are going from bad to worse,” said Aníbal Sosa and Mario Díaz Suarez.
“Trees for pulp production have taken over land formerly used to grow wheat, barley, sunflowers and linseed,” said Carrere, who is also the coordinator of the World Rainforest Movement (WRM). A large percentage of that land used to belong to small and medium-sized farmers who were driven under by the economic crisis that hit the country between 2000 and 2003. “These farmers, left without capital or any kind of government support, sold their fields to the corporations, and at very low prices,” reported Mercedes Borrás, who served as the legal representative of one of the many families strangled by the debts they incurred during the crisis.
Vertical Pulp
Uruguay’s monoculture forestry program was supposed to generate employment and boost exports, but the results have been quite the opposite, said Carrere. Tree farms planted with fast-growing pulpwood species have created only 2,962 new permanent jobs, he notes, while traditional agricultural activities such as cattle, pig and poultry farming and the cultivation of grains and other food crops are a good source of employment. “And given that the monoculture forestry industry has displaced these other activities,” Carrere said, “this forestry model has entailed a net loss of jobs in the farming sector.”
Nor are all the new jobs, good jobs. After government inspectors discovered that workers on some of these plantations live in conditions of near slavery, Labor Minister Eduardo Bonomi announced that the forestry companies involved in this sector will be more closely monitored and regulated. The local nonprofits, Guayubira and REDES-Friends of the Earth have called on the government not only to promote the sustainable use of the large industrial tree farms already established, but also to compensate the affected farmers. They are advocating the creation of an integrated forestry industry, which would include, for example, the building of homes and the manufacture of furniture.
The foreign companies are way ahead in the process of integration, although to different ends than those of the non-profits. Botnia and ENCE, which own some of the largest plantations are building mills in Uruguay to process the wood they grow into pulp for paper products. Another major transnational corporation, the U.S.-based forestry giant Weyerhaeuser, has bought up roughly 135,000 hectares (521 square miles) and recently announced plans to invest $1.2 billion to expand its Uruguayan pulp operations.
That the companies owning the plantations had ambitions in that direction “was established when it was discovered that the main companies involved in this forestry activity were controlled by pulp and paper producers or had been operated with the pre-agreed intent of selling the forested areas to corporations in the industry, which has in fact happened in many cases,” said D’Atri.
Clear-Cutting Jobs
Much of the Uruguayan economic and governmental leadership supports the project and is actively encouraging this agro-industrial project, activist Ortiz told CorpWatch. They argue that the mills will provide jobs. According to the companies’ estimates, the two mills together will provide some 600 direct and permanent jobs. Botnia adds that over the next 11 years, its mill will generate another 6,500 indirect jobs such as planting and harvesting on the tree plantations and transporting the trees to the mills. ENCE, which will produce 500,000 tons of pulp annually, talks about similar job creation.
Currently, some 460 people— mostly from Fray Bentos and mostly working for subcontractors— have jobs building of the mills for about $12 a day. But Delia Villalba of the Movement for Life, Work and Sustainable Development, a local group formed in Fray Bentos, predicts that in the small port city of 24,000 inhabitants, pollution caused by the mills will decrease the number of jobs by destroying tourism, beekeeping, farming, artisanal fishing, and the dairy industries, which, after the civil service sector, are the town’s main sources of employment.
And increasingly as construction speeds up, locals are also facing competition for jobs from hundreds of unemployed workers attracted to the region. “They come from other departments and also from Argentina, Brazil and Paraguay with the hope of getting hired to work on the construction of the plants,” said Villalba, “but there are very few jobs available, and most end up leaving empty-handed.”
Don’t Drink the Water
Meanwhile Stolkin charges that pulp plants run by Botnia and ENCE, will spew contaminants. The use of chlorine dioxide to bleach the pulp creates dioxins and furans. These organochlorines are two of the 12 chemical compounds specifically targeted for elimination under the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs), as the WRM has stressed. They have been shown to weaken the immune system and have been implicated in birth defects, hormonal imbalances, neurological disorders, infertility, and diabetes. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) classifies dioxin as a potential human carcinogen.
Since the manufacture of pulp requires large amounts of water that is used and then disposed of, pulp mills around the world are typically cited on waterways. The Botnia and ENCE plants in the western Uruguayan city of Fray Bentos sit on the Uruguay River, which forms part of the border between Uruguay and Argentina.
The Botnia mill alone, which will produce a million tons of pulp annually, will dump the same amount of wastewater into the river as that generated by a city of 100,000, according to the estimates of local environmentalists.
Botnia spokesperson Faroppa, however, insists that the water taken from the Uruguay River will be so thoroughly treated before being dumped back that it will be even cleaner than it was to begin with.
But if as critics claim, the mills are releasing dioxins and furans, the consequences will be both long-lasting and far-reaching: Dioxins and furans travel long distances through the air and water, take a decade or more to break down, and can have toxic effects even in tiny quantities. They also accumulate in the fatty tissue of living organisms and have been shown to biomagnify, meaning that they increase in concentration the higher up the food chain they move, according to medical reports cited by the Argentine branch of Greenpeace.
Pregnant women can pass these toxins directly to the fetus through the placenta, particularly during the first nine weeks of pregnancy, says Argentine oncologist Ada Rossi Guffanti.
Nor are dioxin and furans the only contaminants associated with pulp production. Carlos Pérez Arrarte, an ecological economics professor and researcher at the University of the Republic predicts that the mills will also release into the river some 600 kilograms of nitrogen and 60 kilograms of phosphorus on a daily basis. Argentine oncologist Ada Rossi Guffanti warns that the chlorate also released by pulp processing kills fish and plants. According to Arrarte, the Botnia mill’s effluents – including 43 tons of organic matter daily – will seriously affect biodiversity and the sustainability of the river’s flora and fauna.
The mills claim that these warnings are based on out-dated technology and data. The most widely used pulp bleaching technique in the world today–and the one used by Botnia and ENCE is Elemental Chlorine-free, or ECF. While cleaner than older technologies, it still releases dioxins, furans and other toxic substances. Safer yet is Totally Chlorine-Free (TCF) process which uses oxygen-based compounds instead of chlorine-based compounds.
Botnia has chosen not to go with this cleaner technology in its Uruguayan mills, says agricultural engineer Carlos Faroppa. The Botnia spokesperson says that the decision was based not on cost, but on quality and effectiveness. The oxygen-based “TCF is hardly used around the world because the technology has not continued to advance,” he said. “The fibers it produces cannot be used to manufacture quality paper.”
But Botnia does, in fact, use TCF technology at its pulp mill in Rauma, Finland, according to Arrarte. The company has not denied or confirmed this version. Botnia and ENCE’s choice of the less safe process means that “Every day, millions of liters of wastewater will be dumped into the river, which will degrade it,” Fray Bento activist Delia Villalba told CorpWatch.
And Don’t Breathe the Air
It is not just the water, but the air, too, that is affected by pulp mills. The large quantities of reduced sulfur compounds such as hydrogen sulfide produce a potent “rotten egg smell” for kilometers around, commented biologist Oscar Galli, one of 60 scientists who sent the Uruguayan government an open letter opposing the pulp mills.
Epidemiological studies show that prolonged exposure to these foul-smelling sulfur compounds increases the risk of acute respiratory infections.
While placing little importance on the health impact of this stench, Botnia itself admits that many people “will stop engaging in outdoor activities in the area around the plant” and avoid nearby public spaces.
But Botnia spokesperson Faroppa stressed that the mill’s emissions will contain the lowest possible levels of pollutants, thanks to strict controls that comply with the standards imposed in the European Union, “which are more demanding than those of the United States,” and monitored by experts from the company itself, the municipal and federal governments, and the University of the Republic.
Indeed, Uruguayan President Tabaré Vázquez has pledged that the mills will be rigorously monitored to ensure that they meet with national environmental protection standards. “We are going to be very strict. Uruguay is one of the countries that puts the most effort into fighting pollution and it will not allow any violations of the rules established for this purpose,” he declared.
Nevertheless, environmentalists doubt that the Uruguayan government will be able to exercise sufficiently strict control over the 24-hour-a-day industrial operations of two pulp sector giants like Botnia and ENCE.
This degree of monitoring would require not only training enough qualified staff, but also making a significant investment in infrastructure for equipment to measure pollutants.
The National Environment Office (DINAMA), the federal government agency responsible for monitoring the companies, is still not equipped to exercise the complex and thorough controls needed. “The DINAMA technicians obviously don’t have the experience,” chemical engineer Ignacio Stolkin told CorpWatch. “They are very capable, but this is something new for them, and it will take them time to learn.”
For now, they don’t even have the required equipment. “It is inconceivable that [effective monitoring] could be achieved in the medium term in our country, given that, for example, a single dioxin-measuring device costs around $300,000,” says Guayubira.
Foreign Fertilizer
The plantations and mills, meanwhile, enjoy powerful and richly funded backers. Large-scale eucalyptus plantations were introduced in Uruguay in 1988, promoted mainly by the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), with the active participation of forestry companies.
At the time, the price of pulpwood on the world market was $60 a ton, and demand was high, says Raúl Zibechi, a professor and researcher at the Franciscan Multiversity of Latin America. International financial agencies were facing increasing criticism over the destruction of the planet’s tropical rainforests as indiscriminate logging of trees for pulp production around the world, was consuming 15 million hectares (58,000 square miles) annually.
New sources were needed and Uruguay, chosen from the climate-controlled offices in distant world capitals, seemed an ideal candidate for monoculture pulpwood production. Montevideo pledged full compliance and provided forestry companies with generous subsidies, soft credits, and tax exemptions. Over 12 years, the Uruguayan government’s support for this sector exceeded $500 million in tax exemptions and direct disbursements, an amount representing almost 4 percent of the country’s annual GDP. To facilitate the transportation and export of the wood, the governments of the day made further investments in new ports, bridges, roads, and railway lines.
So far, owing to low world market prices for pulpwood, the promised economic gains from export have failed to materialize.
By citing the pulp mills near the plantations the corporations hoped ti increase profitability. The pulp project will be partially financed by the World Bank, which will grant each of the foreign companies involved a $200 million loan. Botnia and ENCE will invest a combined $1.8 billion in the two mills, making this the largest direct private investment ever in the country’s history, according to figures released by Minister of the Economy Danilo Astori and Minister of Industry Jorge Lepra.
Much of the Uruguayan economic and governmental leadership, supports the project and is actively encouraging this agro-industrial project, activist Ortiz told CorpWatch.
Big Paper Protest
How much of that increased profit will go to Uruguay is in dispute. With 80 percent of the money going abroad the purchase of equipment and machinery abroad, Botnia and ENCE will actually spend only 20 percent in Uruguay, according representatives of the companies.
Also in doubt is how much will flow to those at the lower end of Uruguay’s economy. Local groups fear that while benefits of the projects concentrate in the foreign and local elites, most Uruguayans will reap only lost jobs, farm land, housing, and health. Charging that pulp mills cause “serious environmental damage that poses great danger to people’s health and lives.” Guayubira, REDES-Friends of the Earth and other groups have launched a major campaign specifically targeted against the mills currently under construction.
The campaign has spread to Gualeguaychú, Argentina, which sits across the Uruguay River from Fray Bentos. Residents of Gualeguaychú are also concerned about the health and environmental effects of the effluents that the mills will dumped into the shared river.
As in Uruguay, Gualeguaychú’s opposition to the mills has been spearheaded by a growing environmental movement, with strong support from trade unions and other social organizations. The Citizens Environmental Assembly of Gualeguaychú has joined with their Uruguayan counterparts to organize public protests.
They are getting support from officials in Argentina. In October 2005, the governor of Entre Ríos, Jorge Busti, sparked a diplomatic incident when he told the Argentine press that Botnia and ENCE had distributed “incentives” among unnamed members of the current Uruguayan government to gain their approval for the construction of the plants.
In response, the companies stated that they had given a $10,000 donation to every Uruguayan political party during the 2004 election campaign, but roundly denied the allegations of bribery implicit in the governor’s statements. In any case, when the new leftist Uruguayan government took office in March, it immediately ratified the authorization for the new mills originally granted by the previous conservative administration.
Some critics also charge that Botnia and ENCE negotiated a sweetheart deal with Montevideo which conceded duty-free zones that will allow the companies to import and export without paying taxes. “If everything comes in and goes out without them having to pay, what does Uruguay get out of it?” asks chemical engineer Stolkin.
On April 30, some 35,000 protestors from Argentina and Uruguay occupied the international bridge that links Fray Bentos to Gualeguaychú for a massive demonstration against Botnia and ENCE. Numerous other joint protests have been held since then, including one involving thousands of schoolchildren from the Argentine city of Entre Ríos, and more are planned for the coming weeks.
Tensions between Argentina and Uruguay are also heating up at the diplomatic level. On September 16, provincial governor Busti – in coordination with Argentine President Néstor Kirchner — filed a complaint against the mill construction projects with the World Bank. Their request that the bank cancel its line of credit to Botnia and ENCE fueled friction between the two nations.
Financing for the projects had been frozen until the International Finance Corporation, which manages the World Bank’s private sector investment program, completed an environmental and social impact study. Released in January, it found that the plants don’t cause substantial environmental damage to the river.
The campaign being waged by local environmentalists took on greater urgency after President Tabaré Vázquez took office in March and Swedish-Finnish forestry giant Stora Enso expressed interest in installing yet another pulp mill in Uruguay.
“Stora Enso is already buying up land for forestry,” warned Carrere. “It wants to acquire a total of 100,000 hectares to plant trees that it will convert to pulp for paper production. This will further reinforce the monoculture-pulp mills model, which drives out productive activities, causes serious environmental problems, and forces rural populations off their lands.”
Pulp Culture
The mills will alter not only the environment of the region, but will radically change the culture. Fray Bentos is now a quiet, unassuming urban landscape where practically the only nod to modernity today is an eight-storey building across from centuries-old Artigas Square, the geographical center of the city. It is proud of having few serious social problems and one of the country’s highest life expectancy.
The pulp industry “can inject a lot of money into the city and boost business undertakings of every kind,” says investment advisor Aldo Manfrini. Already, there is talk of major real estate projects that include a luxury hotel, three shopping malls, two parking lots, two superstores and a privately owned casino, all in the heart of a city currently characterized by narrow tree-lined streets almost free of traffic and quaint single-storey homes.
Manfrini commented that some of these projects, including the hotel and casino, “go hand in hand with the needs that will be created by the influx of industrialists and company executives and officials, both foreign and Uruguayan, who will come to Fray Bentos regularly when the mills are in operation.”
Manfrini admits that the mills will not provide jobs for a very large number of the city’s inhabitants. “But the industrial activity will indirectly bring major benefits for everyone in Fray Bentos,” he maintained. A private school and top-rate private hospital are under consideration to serve a new social sector with considerable buying power: the technicians, managers, administrative directors and other specialized personnel that Botnia and ENCE will transfer to Fray Bentos power.
Supporters cite the boost that all this activity will give the local economy and envisage a significant upgrade to the region’s transportation system of bridges, highways, and private ports linking the mills to domestic and international commerce. Opponents warn of the potential environmental impact of the pulp mills as well as the negative impact of pollution on tourism, fishing and other activities that currently employ thousands of local residents today.
In Las Canteras, one of the city’s most humble neighborhoods, two kilometers away from the city center, Manuel Burgos, 37, an unemployed father of four, is worried. “It’s like being caught between the devil and the deep blue sea,” he explains. “You get your hopes up about the opportunities for a better life that could be opened up by the pulp industry, but at the same time you’re afraid that in the end it won’t be like they promised, and that in addition, they won’t be able to control the pollution,”
Julia Méndez, who is 22, single, a student, and also unemployed, shares Burgos’ doubts, but adds that in any case, it is a risk that has to be taken, because “there are no other prospects in sight in this city.”
Dionisio Cabral Vitale, a 72-year-old retired fisherman, proposes that the matter should be resolved through a large assembly of the city’s residents, even if the discussions take weeks or months.
“Me and a lot of other people are against the mills and especially against the eucalyptus forests, which are taking the water away from 120 families of farmers right here, who would already be finished if the local government didn’t bring them water in tanker trucks. But there are also people in favor of the mills, because they claim there will be more jobs. So I believe that we need to all meet together to reach a decision and tell the government yes or no, because the government never consulted us,” he declared.
This article is republished with permission from Corpwatch.
Posted by anthony
Anthony Lappé is GNN's Executive Editor. He's written for The New York Times, Details, New York, Paper, The Fader and Vice, among many others. He has worked as a producer for MTV and Fuse. He is the co-author of GNN's True Lies and the producer of their Iraq doc,...











This is an excellent article, well researched and aesthetically written. Great editorial choice, thanks!
Sigh… Thanks, Anthony.
You know, I’m suspecting thatmost of the protesters in the argentinean side are in fact “strike-breakers” pay by the gobernor of entre rios mr.Bussi.
The problem goes back to 1996 when bussi wanted to install a pulp factory of similar size in the argentinean side of the river, but he lost the bussines oportunity and now the uruguayans have it (but with different companies).
So I really doubt this is a fight for the enviroment. More like a fight for who gets the pulp factories.
“So I really doubt this is a fight for the enviroment. More like a fight for who gets the pulp factories.”
I just found a scholarly paper by Leif Ohlsson called LIVELIHOOD CONFLICTS: LINKING POVERTY & ENVIRONMENT AS CAUSES OF CONFLICT. It argues that environmental degradation comes first, followed by relatively sudden loss of livelihood (more important as a source of conflict than entrenched poverty), which is then exploited by elites (by providing livelihood in militias or factories). Below is Mr. Ohlsson’s summation:
By the livelihood conflicts approach employed so far, I hope to have showed, first of all the crucial importance of generating and sustaining livelihoods for avoiding conflicts. Secondly, the importance of maintaining environmental resources above critical sustainability levels, in order to facitilitate the task of sustaining livelihoods, has been stressed. The third and last point to emphasize is that even the necessity of creating livelihoods in cities have to be underpinned by healthy ecosystems for their immediate and day-to-day survival, but also in order to reduce the pressure on creating jobs in cities. Those who can maintain a life in rural areas, will not become foot-soldiers in the potential armies of unemployed fomenting in cities.
Against that backdrop, the most recent report from the World Wildllife Fund on the state of the world’s ecosystems raises serious alarm. The report (WWF 2000) states that the productivity and resilience of ecosystems have deteriorated by at least 30 percent during the last thirty years. During the same span of time human pressure on the environment (the “ecological footprint” of human societies) has increased by some 50 percent. The report further concludes that sustainability levels of ecosystems as a whole in fact were transgressed already at some time during the 70s. What these figures imply is, that at the exact period of time when environmental resources would be most needed in order to provide livelihoods, they are depleted below their regenerating ability – ironically to a large degree as a result of the imperative to maintain and create livelihoods.
In the future, larger populations will not even have access to the same amounts of environmental services previous generations enjoyed, but less. On a per-capita level environmental services of course will be far less. The world at present thus seems to abound with one great scarcity, namely that of renewable resources and healthy ecosystems, forming the base for liveli-hoods; and one potential great affluence, namely the productive capacity of all those women and men rendered powerless and poor by the unability to find an opportunity for livelihood.
In the combination of these two facets fortunately also lies a potential for overcoming the glaring discrepancy posed by them. A new study by the WorldWatch Institute reports that creating an environmentally sustainable economy already has generated an estimated 14 million jobs worldwide, with the promise of millions more in the century ahead of us. The often voiced fear of a contradiction between jobs and environmental protection is, in fact, fiction, according to the report. “Jobs are more likely to be at risk where environmental standards are low and where innovation in favour of cleaner technologies is lagging”, says author Michael Renner (2000). Environmental job creation today may be largest in developed countries (e.g. in the wind-power generating sector), while job creation is particularly important in the developing world, where almost all of the growth in population will take place in the coming decades. “The trouble is that human labour appears too expensive, while energy and raw material inputs appear dirt cheap”, says Renner. “Businesses have long sought to compete by economizing on their use of labour. To build a sustainable economy, we need to economize on the use of energy and materials instead.”
Dude, did you read my ENTIRE post? I meant this is a political confligt due to the location of the pulp factories.
What I say is that without Bussi’s ambitions there would be very little people protesting there (the ones that are really affected) and not the uncontrolled mob we see today.
Hyper, its Busti, not Bussi, Bussi was the governor of Tucuman.. it is political o course, but dont be stubborn either, those rivers are a main artery of the region and the country and they are already pretty screwed.
Presentan un informe sobre el impacto ecológico de las papeleras
Desde la Cancillería argentina adelantaron que una delegación demostrará el impacto ambiental que representará la puesta en marcha de las dos procesadoras de celulosa en la costa del Río Uruguay. Una comisión con técnicos de ambos países mantiene este mediodía un encuentro para emitir un informe conjunto. Presentarán un informe sobre el impacto ambiental de las plantas.
La Argentina presentará hoy a Uruguay un informe en el que se detalla el impacto ecológico que provocaría la instalación de las dos papeleras en la ciudad uruguaya de Fray Bentos, en ocasión de la última reunión de la comisión técnica binacional que se realizará en Buenos Aires. Fuentes de la Cancillería argentina informaron a la prensa que en el último encuentro de la comisión, los delegados argentinos demostrarán el impacto ambiental que representará la puesta en marcha de dos procesadoras de celulosa en el margen oriental del Río Uruguay.
La comisión creada a principios de junio del 2005, y conformada por técnicos de ambos países, estáreunida desde las 11 en el edificio de la Cancillería y de acuerdo al cronograma de trabajo deberá emitir un informe conjunto para el 30 de enero sobre la instalación de las papeleras de la empresa finlandesa Botnia y la española Ence.
La comisión está integrada por funcionarios de las dos cancillerías y los gobiernos nacionales y provinciales, y la supervisa un grupo de técnicos de la Universidad de la República, de Uruguay, y de la Universidad Nacional del Litoral, de Argentina.
En todos estos meses, las delegaciones continuaron intercambiando información, aunque la Argentina señaló en distintas oportunidades la demora de la parte uruguaya en hacer llegar la documentación solicitada.
Desde Uruguay, el ministro de Medio Ambiente, Jaime Baigorria, sumó un nuevo aspecto al debate al señalar que el gobierno argentino ya había aceptado, oportunamente, la instalación de las papeleras en Fray Bentos.
“Ya no es un tema de naturaleza ambiental. Esto ha quedado consustanciado en los informes hechos por nuestros técnicos que ya estaba en conocimiento de la cancillería argentina. Ya se había clausurado este tema de disputa, y solamente quedaba pendiente hacer los monitoreos de agua del Río Uruguay”, afirmó el funcionario oriental.
En tanto, el embajador argentino en Uruguay, Hernán Patiño Mayer, defendió a los vecinos de Gualeguaychú que cortaron el último fin de semana la ruta internacional hacia Uruguay y afirmó que no son “delincuentes” ni “forajidos”, a pocas horas que el Gobierno de Tabaré Vázquez expresara por carta su preocupación por las consecuencias turísticas y comerciales de los bloqueos de caminos y puentes.
“No estamos hablando de delincuentes, no estamos hablando de forajidos”, enfatizó el diplomático
primer funcionario argentino en salir al cruce de la carta del gobierno uruguayoal defender al grupo ambientalista que rechaza la instalación de las papeleras.En ese sentido, el diplomático subrayó que “no estamos hablando de gente que está rompiendo o destrozando la propiedad pública o privada, sino de gente que está ejerciendo el libre derecho de manifestar”.
En el marco de la protesta, cinco ambientalistas de la organización Greenpeace y dos fotógrafos fueron detenidos esta mañana durante dos horas tras una protesta que realizaron hoy sobre el muelle de la papelera Botnia, en la costa de Fray Bentos (Uruguay), donde instalaron un campamento tras acceder al lugar con gomones. Por la tarde, las fuerzas de seguridad uruguayas detuvieron a otros siete activistas y a un fotógrafo de esa ONG. Los activistas de Greenpeace son ciudadanos de Alemania, Argentina, Brasil, Chile, Finlandia, Italia, México y Uruguay, y cruzaron el río Uruguay a bordo de gomones y desembarcaron en el muelle de Botnia, donde permanecieron hasta la llegada de la prefectura local.
A little cronology of the conflict as reported by Clarin newspaper
20 October, 2005 Tabaré Vázquez pondrá la piedra fundamental de una de las papeleras
31 October, 2005 Tensión diplomática con Uruguay por el conflicto de las papeleras
31 October, 2005 Marcha de botes, lanchas y veleros por el río Uruguay
28 November, 2005 Gualeguaychú: los vecinos, duros con las papeleras
19 December, 2005 Cortaron puentes para protestar por las papeleras
20 December, 2005 Un informe del Banco Mundial respalda a las papeleras en Uruguay
20 December, 2005 La resistencia de Gualeguaychú
27 December, 2005 Rio Mistico
27 December, 2005 Una reunión clave en Cancillería
28 December, 2005 Papeleras: el Gobierno insiste con la suspensión de las obras
4 January, 2006 Primer corte sorpresivo de ruta contra las papeleras
7 January, 2006 Busti ahora va a la Justicia federal
7 January, 2006 ““La guerra del papel”:http://www.clarin.com/diario/2006/01/07/elpais/p-00404.htm
12 January, 2006 Anuncian que una tercera papelera se instalará en Uruguay
14 January, 2006 Volvieron a cortar la frontera con Uruguay en protesta por las papeleras
17 January, 2006 Cronología de un conflicto de tono creciente
18 January, 2006 Papeleras: incidentes, cortes de ruta y diez activistas detenidos
18 January, 2006 Contaminación: Taiana cuestionó un informe del Banco Mundial
OK, siempre fui malo para los nombres, pero el punto es que si o si habria ambientalistas y eso, pero la protesta no tendria la profundidad ni la fuerza que tiene hoy dia si no fuese porque las papeleras se estan haciendo del otro lado
es muy interesante la perspectiva, y bastante realista. SIN EMBARGO, THEIR IS TREMENDOUS BINATIONAL OPPOSITION TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THESE PULP PLANTS....además, las papeleras fueron un tópico en la campaña de tabaré, el obtuvo mucho apoyo de la comunidad ambientalista uruguaya, pero fue la primera promesa rota cuando él dijo que las celulosas se van a construir. es importante ver la celulosa en términos internacionales también….misiones, paraná, y por supuesto el sur de chile…..ese libro es un poco viejo pero demuestra bien el dinamica internacional….
the northern hemisphere is basically unloading paper production onto the southern hemisphere…..
El papel del sur
Argentine governor takes pulp mill protest to Hague
die of thirst rather than admit hemp makes best pulp~
stupid human tricks! :-(
Uruguay confirms that it will go to the O.A.S. because of the the cut of the bridges
The vice chancellor, Belela Herrera, said that there isnt a defined date yet to make the presentation. And that president Tabaré Vázquez “is very worried” about the issue.
————————————————————————————————————————
The Uruguayan government confirmed today that it will take before the Organization of the American States (O.A.S.) the conflict of the pulp factories, because of the damages the country is suffering as a result of the the cut of route and bridges by Argentine environmentalists. Vice Chancellor Belela Herrera confirmed that the decision was made by president Tabaré Vázquez.
“There is a proposal of Vázquez in that sense, but the date is not defined. The president is very worried” about the subject, said Herrera to Clarín.
The possibility had already been considered that Uruguay presented the issue before the O.A.S. or United Nations (UN), if the Argentine attitude of blocking two of three international bridges that connect both countries continues.
The blockades of Argentine environmentalists began in December in the bridgeheads that unite Gualeguaychú with Fray Bentos and Colón with Paysandú. Uruguayan civil employees and industralists have denounced for some time the economic damages that these protests cause them.
The bridge between Gualeguayú and Fray Bentos remains cut from the 3 of February, whereas the fluvial step between Paysandú and Colón is blocked from the past Thursday 16.
Even, several civil employees described the cuts as a “economic blockade”. In that sense, the minister of Uruguayan Transport, Víctor Rossi, said yesterday that “there is a blockade that at this point is easy to understand that the environmental preoccupation transformed itself into a very important economic damage for Uruguay”. The minister faces the reclamations of the companies of transport of passengers and load by the disadvantages that they have as a result of the protests.
In that sense, Rossi affirmed that Uruguay “is going to cross all the ways to defend its interest and the interest of its population”.