Shooting War Getting A Grip Wolves In Sheep's Clothing

A01561

Guerrilla Journalism Fund
Articles : "War on Terror"
_NEWS IMAGE_
 Bush talks tough on Iran 
U.S.-backed groups organize regime change in Iran

Like the color-coded terror alert system, the technicolor Velvet Invasions blink warning. Despite receiving an ugly bruise in Uzbekistan, the CIA and its NGO (non-governmental organization) regime change industry hope to stage another cardboard coup in Iran. But it could be a Black & Blue Revolution.

Citing a ‘mission accomplished’ in Iraq, President Bush told 25,000 soldiers in Fort Hood, Texas; “The establishment of a free Iraq is a watershed event in the global democratic revolution. That success is sending a message from Beirut to Tehran.”

Tasked by the Bush administration with sending that message from America to Tehran, and “winning hearts and minds” is ‘swiftboat veteran’ author Jerome Corsi. On May 16, Corsi’s NGO, The Iran Freedom Foundation, inaugurated a 12-day “Iran Freedom Walk” from Philadelphia’s Liberty Bell to Washington, D.C.

Dipping two fingers in red paint, Corsi waved a peace sign in solidarity “with the blood of oppressed Iranians” and called on “the spirit of Mahatma Ghandi and Martin Luther King.” He declared; “I love the Iranian people. America does not hate the Persian people. We love the Persian people. We want peace and we love the Persian people.” Corsi’s voice then dropped to a whisper; “We stand here today and we pray in the name of the Gods. I embrace Jesus Christ as my savior—and we also pray in the name of Allah, Zoroaster, and the B’hai.”

But Corsi has expressed very different opinions on Islam in the past. According to his own postings on FreeRepublic.com, on November 18, 2001, Corsi used a racial slur to define Arabs; “Ragheads are Boy-Bumpers [sodomizers] as clearly as they are Women Haters—it all goes together.” In November 2002, Corsi said; “They think the liberals will never let out that these two were lovers . . . typical Islamic boy-buggering. Older man with younger man—black Muslims . . .” Using the incendiary style he perfected for ‘swiftboat veteran’ TV attack ads, Jerome Corsi continued; “Islam is a peaceful religion as long as the women are beaten, the boys buggered, and the infidels killed.” Comparing Islam to a disease, he added; “How’s this for an analogy? The Koran is simply the ‘software’ for producing deviant cancer cell political behavior and violence in human beings” and “Islam is like a virus. It affects the mind. Maybe even better as an analogy: it is a cancer that destroys the body it infects. No doctor would hesitate to eliminate cancer cells from the body.” In April 2004, Corsi added; “Let’s see why it isn’t the case that Islam is a worthless, dangerous, Satanic religion. Where’s the proof to the contrary?”

Surrounding Corsi at his ‘Freedom Walk’ were three dozen Los Angeles Iranian dissidents and pro-monarchists interviewed by an Orthodox Jewish journalist and by the CIA-backed Voice of America and Radio Free Europe/Radio Farda. The Los Angeles Times of March 20, 2005, revealed that ‘Tehrangeles’ has become a crucial recruiting ground for Iranian expatriates who gather information for the US intelligence community. Also providing assistance are various Farsi language media who broadcast messages against the Iranian government into Iran.

According to the March 4, 2005, Los Angeles Times, the U.S. currently spends $14.7 million a year on Farsi “opposition broadcasts” into Iran. The Voice of America’s Farsi service reaches an estimated 15 million Iranians with news programs and websites, and the Bush administration has recently requested an additional $5.7 million in 2006 to expand the hours of transmission.

Los Angeles Farsi radio station KRSI noted the similarity between current U.S. efforts and the CIA’s 1953 overthrow of Iran’s democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadeq. When asked if he was CIA affiliated Corsi replied; “No I’m not. I’ve never held a government position, never had any government position at all. I’ve been in universities. I’m an author. I’m in business. I’m not related to the CIA. It’s just not true.”

But when later asked how he became so committed to Iranian liberation, he explained; “When I was a young man I was an expert in antiterrorism and political violence. I had a top secret clearance when I was in universities and I worked to assist the State Department and the government.” Corsi’s publisher, Cumberland House, states in his biography that Corsi’s top secret clearance came from the government agency USAID. USAID has often served as a conduit for American covert operations funding, under humanitarian auspices.

I then asked Corsi about the Iran Freedom Foundation’s funding. He said the money came from sales of his book “Atomic Iran” and from private donations, adding that the IFF would apply for government funding when it became available.

That government funding may be on the way. On February 11, 2005 a promoter of the Iran Freedom Foundation, Worldnetdaily.com announced that Corsi had helped Republican Senator Paul Santorum write the Iran Freedom and Support Act of 2005. The legislation was to authorize $10 million in assistance to pro-democracy NGOs that challenge the Iranian regime. Corsi called that figure a “starting point.”

It was an accurate projection. According to the May 5 Financial Times article, “US offers grants to help oppose clerics,” Guy Dinmore reported that lawmakers demanded a bill aimed at overthrowing the Iranian government be increased to $50 million. This did not include the millions of dollars provided by the State Department’s Middle East Partnership Initiative. “We have turned opposition into a profession,” commented Ray Takeyh of the Council on Foreign Relations. “This money is going to go up.”

Such “soft power” opposition activities are escalating. The May 29 New York Times quoted R. Nicholas Burns, under secretary of state for political affairs, as saying the Bush team was “taking a page from the playbook” of colored revolutions where the U.S. funded pro-democracy NGOs helped nonviolently overthrow noncompliant governments.

The Iran Freedom Foundation lists several such activities on its website. Corsi’s book “Atomic Iran” is being translated into Farsi for clandestine distribution in Iran, there is an online petition targeting the mullahs, IFF university associations are mobilizing college students, and a national speakers bureau to educate Americans on Iranian atrocities has been deployed. The IFF is also filming a documentary and has begun running TV ads entitled; “An Atomic 9–11: When Evil is Appeased” accusing Iran of plans to detonate a 150 kiloton nuclear bomb in New York City. (When I reminded Corsi that it was the US who began Iran’s nuclear program in the 1970s, and that Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld sat on the board of ABB which sold North Korea its nuclear reactors in the 1990’s, he refused to address the issue.)

The IFF’s efforts are supplemented by an array of related sister organizations such as Regime Change Iran, Alliance for Democracy in Iran, Iran of Tomorrow Movement, the Iranian Opposition Council, and “The 70 Million People of Iran” who are organizing an election for a secular interim government in exile “ready to assume Iran’s governmental functions.” The group has also issued an ultimatum letter to world leaders, demanding they void all contracts with Iran. (Halliburton contracts in Iran were not mentioned). This small U.S.-backed group, presuming to speak for 70 million Iranians, even borrowed State Department lingo urging “the removal of the Islamic Republic to win the ‘War on Terror.’”

Corsi’s IFF has also endorsed the Free Iran Project, an enterprise created by Reagan Doctrine policy advisor Jack Wheeler. (In January 2005, Wheeler advocated that President Bush use nuclear weapons to destroy Mecca if America suffers another terrorist attack. Wheeler bragged on his website “To The Point” that Osama Bin Laden is “playing poker with a Texas cowboy holding all the nuclear aces.”)

The goal of these strategies, Corsi announced at his event, was to incite mass protests against Iran’s June 17 presidential elections and thus destabilize the regime. Iranian dissident Ghassem Sholeh Sadi agreed. In the New York Sun article, “Iranian dissidents asking aid from Bush,” Sadi explained; “After the events in Kyrgystan, there is an idea to try to turn the elections into a referendum and uprising.”

As early as 2003, Reuters printed allegations that the U.S. had infiltrated several million dollars into the country to bribe officials and pay protestors. The Economist of June 13, 2003, headlined; “More unrest on the streets of Tehran. Is America pulling the strings?”

America is pulling strings, with Israeli assistance. The former head of Mossad’s Foreign Intelligence Division, Uzi Arad, told Worldnetdaily.com; “Support of Iranian opposition by the international community could be an effective way to handle the current regime” and that “its stability can be geatly reduced by the people themselves.” Pro-Israel lobbyist Michael Ledeen wrote for the neoconservative American Enterprise Institute; “Mr. Bush is correct that we should actively help the brave Iranians who are leading demonstrations against the regime . . .”

Israel’s Student Solidarity Movement and The Jewish Agency recently staged protests at Iranian embassies worldwide. The Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz reported “AIPAC [American Israel Political Action Committee] is spurring Congress to pass a sanctions bill against Iran.” AIPAC is also pressuring the US to support the Iranian Mujahedin-e-Khalq (National Council of Resistance of Iran) for use against Iran’s mullahs.

MEK has been legally designated a terrorist organization since 1997 for killing U.S. citizens, for its role in the 1979 seizure of the U.S. embassy in Tehran, and for attacking coalition troops in Iraq. Human Rights Watch recently condemned them for use of torture, bombings and assassinations. Nevertheless, 150 congressmen have petitioned Bush to remove them from the terrorism list, and several lawmakers spoke at their 2005 convention in Washington, D.C.

The Israeli Communication Ministry’s R.R. Sat provides transponder capability to the MEK to broadcast programming on its two channels. Iran-interlink.org even hints that Ariel Sharon personally approved funding for the broadcasts, because of his alliance with MEK founder Maryam Rajavi.

On May 28, The Iran Freedom Foundation’s “Freedom Walk” reached the White House. The closing rally featured Richard Perle, former assistant secretary of defense and pro-Israel architect of Bush’s Middle East policy. Jerome Corsi then phoned the White House where President Bush congratulated the marchers and offered support. Vice President Cheney’s office also thanked the IFF. Corsi vowed; “If we can find sufficient monetary resources, we plan to send funds inside Iran to support those oppressed.”

In response, USA Today reported that Iranian Ambassador to the UN Mohammad Javad Zarif denounced these types of U.S. measures as a violation of the Algiers Accords. The Algiers Accords freed 52 American embassy hostages in exchange for a US promise “not to intervene directly or indirectly, politically or militarily, in Iran’s internal affairs.” Iran may file a complaint with the International Court of Justice in the Hague to stop U.S. interference.

According to Reuters, Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Hamid Reza Asefi threatened; “Iran has always defended its interests with full power and will continue to do so. It won’t hesitate even for a fraction of a moment to defend itself” and Iran’s government has pledged harsh resistance. If the CIA and its associated regime change NGOs succeed, it could be a very bloody black & blue coup.

Trish Schuh has worked with ABCnews, Al Arabiya, Tehran Times, Syria Times and Iran News Daily. She recently observed the presidential elections in Iran.

This article appears in Counterpunch Magazine.

anthony

Posted by anthony
Anthony Lappé is GNN's Executive Editor. He's written for The New York Times, Details, New York, Paper, The Fader and Vice, among many others. He has worked as a producer for MTV and Fuse. He is the co-author of GNN's True Lies and the producer of their Iraq doc,...

Disclaimer: Statements and opinions expressed in articles published on this site are those of the authors and not of the staff or editors of GNN, unless otherwise stated.

RECENT COMMENTS

thanks for the article, that’s some pretty fucked up shit…. it’s honestly hard not to hate sometimes… i find i can’t resist..

alpinestar @ 07/26/05 11:02:44

Say it ain’t so, alpine…

Though Iranian “democracy” is certainly questionable, the jackass responsible for this commercial should not be calling the charge for reform. This commercial (the one mentioned in the article) is hilarious.

Seriously though, someone needs to take power away from Khamenei and the Guardian Council. They shoudln’t be removed from the public sphere – but they have way too much power, and things could be balanced out more.

Care to take a crack at it Canada? Your hands seem relatively blood-free.

Porktamer @ 07/26/05 13:25:06

“Seriously though, someone needs to take power away from Khamenei and the Guardian Council.”

What the fuck are you thinking Porktamer?

Yeah the religious right in Iran sucks. They hijacked the Iranian revolution from the leftests that started it and then killed more of them than the Shah ever did.

But the fact that you think that “someone” needs to take power away from them is hilarious. They wouldn’t even be there if the CIA had not taken Mossadeq out in the first place. That started a chain of events that led to the Islamic revival in Iran and in the region in general.

The religious right sucks in the U.S. too. But you’d be picking up arms to defend it if “someone” decided to help take it out by force.

You can’t fix anything by killing people. Coups and bloody revolutions do nothing other than cause deaths to the populace being affected. Anyone who thinks that you can peacefully change a country from the outside is a moron. It’s the Iranian people’s responsibility to change their country from within, at their own pace, without causing any more death and destruction in the process.

progeria @ 07/26/05 20:08:12

It’s the Iranian people’s responsibility to change their country from within, at their own pace, without causing any more death and destruction in the process.

Absolutely, I agree with that. But Porktamer might be saying someone within Iran should check the power of the mullahs. Then maybe the United States would not be able to get in there.

Suitcaseman @ 07/26/05 21:43:49

i think one of the main reasons the mullahs are so powerful is because of the constant threat from the U.S. from the persian perspective (and i have many friends there), there is this looming threat outside, and when it’s a matter of life or limb, as many in Iran (and the middle east in general) people tend to turn towards god… i think an analogy can be drawn with the U.S and the re-election of bush… people were/are afraid of another terrorist attack, so when the shit gets serious, most find religion pretty fast…

alpinestar @ 07/27/05 00:10:17

porktamer:

I think canada could take iran in a fight, for sure!! we’d even apologize afterwards!

thanks for the commercial, what a joke!

alpinestar @ 07/27/05 00:16:08

AIPAC is also pressuring the US to support the Iranian Mujahedin-e-Khalq (National Council of Resistance of Iran) for use against Iran’s mullahs.

MEK has been legally designated a terrorist organization since 1997 for killing U.S. citizens, for its role in the 1979 seizure of the U.S. embassy in Tehran, and for attacking coalition troops in Iraq. Human Rights Watch recently condemned them for use of torture, bombings and assassinations. Nevertheless, 150 congressmen have petitioned Bush to remove them from the terrorism list, and several lawmakers spoke at their 2005 convention in Washington, D.C.

here are some interesting reads on this MEK:

csmonitor

U.S. Department of State

BurningMonk @ 07/27/05 01:42:03

I am Canada. I will not interfere in any way with the affairs of other nations. Even though I may deem those affairs to be unjust or undemocratic. I respect the fact that ideologies are relative and I will not impose my ideology. However, I do favor the concept of a global agency that enforces the basic morals of human rights. I give my money and ideas to the United Nations. I frown apon rougue nations taking the law into their own hands.

SmokyTiger @ 07/27/05 04:29:50

PM DEMANDS QUICK PULLOUT, but will they find their way home through Iran?

Twitch @ 07/27/05 09:16:24

Hahaha, calm down Progeria…

As Suitcaseman suggested… that “someone” could very well be the Iranian people themselves. In fact, that’s what I would prefer. I would also love it if the international community would help – you know, organizations like the UN and such…

I never said anything about force – remember the “they shouldn’t be removed from the public sphere, “ line in my post? I know that I sometimes rush my posts, but I was implying that they be kicked down a notch, not removed from power.

The Canada thing was joke… Alpine and Smoky seemed to get it.

Aside from your knee-jerk reaction – you raise some good points, though.

Porktamer @ 07/27/05 10:30:40

Reading the last two lines of my previous post – maybe I AM that retarded, Progeria.

Porktamer @ 07/27/05 10:34:33

naw, you’re not retarded. it’s hard to write about this crap as it’s out of our control and more complex than it looks.

alpinestar’s comment is right on the money – “i think one of the main reasons the mullahs are so powerful is because of the constant threat from the U.S.”

it’s the saddest part of the whole situation in the middle east. radical islam would not be so powerful if there wasn’t constant intervention from the U.S., Europe, Isreal, etc.

the mullahs took control of iran when there was a power vacuum after the revolution. the situation with the shah was so terrible that everything boiled over and change came way too quickly.

we’ll probably see something similar happen in saudi arabia. south america is milatirzing again and we’ll see more violence there.

this world is way too freaking small. there isn’t really anywhere that you can go which isn’t:

A. totally screwed up by western imperialism
B. under constant threat of being terrorized
C. just plain poor or environmentally degraded

except maybe for the countries that didn’t support the Iraq war and that are isolated. New Zealand seems to be pretty safe…

progeria @ 07/28/05 17:12:48
Login

Sign up for the GNN newsletter to get the first word on video premieres and breaking news. signup

Read the GNN FAQ for information about the site, forum rules and other GNN 2.0 information. faq

Optimized for FireFox
To download the Firefox web browser, visit mozilla.com Get Firefox

  • Advertise With GNN
  • SUPPORT GNN! Support GNN

    TEES/DVDS @ GNN STORE

    Buy Our Tees
  • Bloggers' Rights at EFF